These activities included the Societal Experts Action Network and a White House Office of Science and Technology Policy epidemiological summit held in November 2020, which emphasized the role of social and behavioral sciences in developing modeling strategies to prevent future pandemics. The meeting also highlighted the investments that were made to inform the response to COVID-19 and future pandemics. Daniel Goroff, director of the SBE Division of Social and Economic Sciences, explained some of the issues regarding differential privacy in facilitating data linkages. Vipin Arora, deputy director of NCSES, provided insight on the NSF role in developing an NSDS through partnerships and with the leadership of NCSES director Emilda Rivers on the Advisory Committee on Data for Evidence-Building. She also highlighted some considerations on the minds of federal agencies: tiered access, privacy tradeoffs, communications, and return on investments. Levine wrote, “With the experience of NSF with FFRDCs and NSF’s role as an independent agency with the mission of the wellbeing of science, NCSES is well situated as a statistical agency to take on this responsibility.”Īmy O’Hara, Research Professor, Massive Data Institute, and Executive Director, Federal Statistical Research Data Center, McCourt School of Public Policy, Georgetown University, detailed the assets and liabilities that federal agencies would have in implementing an NSDS. In those comments, AERA Executive Director Felicce J. As a federal statistical agency, NCSES has the protections afforded to it under the Confidential Information Protection and Statistical Efficiency Act.ĪERA recently concurred with ongoing efforts to house the NSDS in a FFRDC at NCSES, including in comments in February to the Advisory Committee on Data for Evidence Building. In considering the best place to house the NSDS, a recent report recommended establishing a Federally-Funded Research Data Center (FFRDC) at NCSES, to limit political interference and to support data enclaves and microdata. ![]() She also described some of the key attributes of an NSDS, including transparency and trust, independence, and intergovernmental support. Nancy Potok, former chief statistician of the United States, provided an overview of the CEP’s work and the Foundations for Evidence-based Policymaking Act, which incorporated many of the CEP’s recommendations. The NSDS, recommended by the Commission on Evidence-based Policymaking (CEP) as part of using data for building evidence, would facilitate secure data linkages across federal agencies. The advisory committee heard from several experts on the development of the National Secure Data Service (NSDS) and its potential future home in the National Center for Science Engineering and Statistics (NCSES). The meeting covered a range of topics, including an update on new funding opportunities from SBE a conversation on broader impacts and discussion on initiatives SBE is undertaking to address discrimination, bias, and equity. ![]() These data are normally highly detailed, and may also be derived from administrative sources.The National Science Foundation’s (NSF) Social, Behavioral, and Economic (SBE) Sciences Advisory Committee held its spring meeting on May 6–7. In addition, researchers are asked to fulfil a number of additional application requirements. These data are deemed potentially identifiable, and can only be accessed through a secure access facilities (as opposed to download). A number of confidential and sensitive microdata sources are becoming available through secure access facilities across the UK.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |